In today's dynamic world of finance, a sense of security and certainty is crucial for both individuals seeking financial support and institutions providing loans. Concerns often arise regarding complex legal processes, lengthy court disputes, and unforeseen costs that can accompany financial transactions. It is precisely in response to these challenges that the Polish legal system offers an effective tool – Article 777 of the Code of Civil Procedure (KPC).
This provision enables quick and effective claim enforcement, minimizing risk and providing peace of mind to both parties. This article is a comprehensive guide that will explain what voluntary submission to enforcement is, what benefits it offers to both the borrower and the lender, how the entire process works, and what to pay attention to in order to feel completely secure.
Article 777 §1 point 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a provision that allows a debtor to submit a statement in the form of a notarial deed, in which they voluntarily submit to enforcement. What does this mean in practice? If the debtor fails to fulfill their obligation, the creditor (e.g. PaveNow) can directly refer the matter to a bailiff, without the need for lengthy and costly court proceedings.
Notarial deed as an enforcement titleThe key role of a notarial deed prepared under Article 777 KPC is that it becomes an "enforcement title." After being granted an enforcement clause by the court, this document acquires legal force equivalent to a final court judgment. This means the creditor does not have to file a lawsuit, which significantly speeds up and simplifies the debt collection process.
What must the debtor's statement contain?For a statement of voluntary submission to enforcement to be effective, the notarial deed must contain precisely defined elements:
The application of Article 777 KPC is a solution that brings tangible benefits to both parties of a loan agreement, building mutual trust and process efficiency.
Although voluntary submission to enforcement may sound serious, in reality, it is a mechanism that, in case of repayment problems, minimizes negative consequences and provides predictability.
For PaveNow, Article 777 KPC is a key risk management tool that directly translates into the ability to offer more attractive financing conditions.
The process of signing a statement of voluntary submission to enforcement based on Article 777 KPC is simple and proceeds in several clearly defined steps, ensuring its efficiency and accessibility for every PaveNow client.
PaveNow actively supports its borrowers in organizing a meeting with a notary. We understand that formalities can be overwhelming, which is why we help arrange a convenient date. We cooperate with reputable notary offices in strategic locations, e.g., in Warsaw at al. Sikorskiego and Plac Bankowy 1, which ensures easy access to the service. Our goal is to simplify this stage as much as possible so that you can focus on your financial needs.
During the visit to the notary, in accordance with applicable regulations, it is required to have a valid identification document. This can be an ID card or passport. This is a standard verification procedure that ensures the security and legality of the entire transaction. Make sure your document is current and valid to avoid unnecessary delays.
At the notary's office, the notary will carefully read the content of the document, ensuring that you fully understand all its provisions and consequences. You have every right to ask questions and request additional explanations. Only after ensuring that everything is clear to you will you sign. This creates a notarial deed with an enforcement clause, which becomes a legally binding document.What is important and what distinguishes PaveNow's offer is the fact that PaveNow covers the full cost of the notary visit. The borrower does not incur any fees related to this process. Covering notary costs by PaveNow is a key differentiator and a trust-building element. In the context of the disadvantages of voluntary submission to enforcement for the debtor, one of the frequently mentioned drawbacks is precisely the cost of the notarial deed. Clearly stating that PaveNow bears this cost directly neutralizes this potential disadvantage from the borrower's perspective, transforming it into a strong advantage and competitive edge for the company.
Understanding the enforcement process is crucial for both parties to an agreement secured by Article 777 KPC. Although the goal is to avoid enforcement, awareness of its course builds trust and allows for responsible financial management.
For a notarial deed, in which the debtor has submitted to enforcement, to become the basis for initiating enforcement proceedings, the creditor must obtain an "enforcement clause." The court grants this clause upon the creditor's request, transforming the notarial deed from an enforcement title into an enforcement writ.
The court examines the application for granting an enforcement clause immediately, usually no later than 3 days from the date of its submission. The court fee for submitting the application for the clause is only PLN 50. This proceeding takes place at a closed session, which means that the presence of the parties – both the creditor and the debtor – is not required. In this proceeding, the court does not assess the validity of the legal act itself, but only checks whether the notarial deed meets the formal requirements specified in Article 777 §1 KPC.
After obtaining the enforcement writ, the creditor may submit an application for initiating enforcement proceedings to a court bailiff. The competent bailiff is usually the one who operates at the court in the district of the debtor's place of residence or registered office.
As part of the enforcement proceedings, the bailiff has the right to seize various components of the debtor's assets. These may include movable property (e.g., cars, equipment), real estate (e.g., apartments, houses), part of remuneration for work (with certain limitations), and funds accumulated in a bank account (also with limitations). Importantly, enforcement is not limited exclusively to monetary obligations; the bailiff may also enforce non-monetary obligations, such as supervising the handover of real estate or premises.
Despite many advantages, voluntary submission to enforcement based on Article 777 KPC also involves certain risks and limitations for the borrower, of which they should be aware. PaveNow strives for full transparency, which is why it is important that you know all aspects of this solution.
One of the main threats is the risk of imprecise drafting of the notarial deed. As mentioned earlier, the court may refuse to grant an enforcement clause if the deed imprecisely defines the debtor's obligation, the deadline for its performance, or the monetary sum. Such a situation, although it seems to be a problem for the creditor, can in practice lead to lengthy court disputes and additional costs also for the debtor, who was counting on a quick resolution of the matter. This is particularly important because the court in enforcement clause proceedings does not examine the validity of the legal act, but only the formal requirements of the deed.
The fast enforcement path characteristic of Article 777 KPC means that the debtor has less time to potentially challenge the claim than in the case of a traditional court process. After obtaining the enforcement clause, the creditor can almost immediately refer the matter to a bailiff.
Another aspect is the cost of preparing the notarial deed. Although PaveNow declares to cover these costs, in other situations, the debtor bears the notary fee, which depends on the amount of the obligation and includes the notary's fee, VAT, and fees for copies.It should also be remembered that a statement of submission to enforcement cannot be easily withdrawn. A notarial deed is a document with great legal force. The possibility of challenging or invalidating it is limited and requires filing a lawsuit with the court to declare the legal act invalid. The basis for this are the so-called defects in the declaration of will, such as lack of awareness or freedom, fictitiousness, error, distortion, deceit, or threat. The deadline for challenging a notarial deed for these reasons is usually one year from the cessation of the fear (in case of threat) or the discovery of the error. After this period, the deed becomes fully valid and effective.
It is also worth noting that claims covered by Article 777 KPC may become time-barred, usually after 6 years, although this period may vary depending on the type of claim.
In this section, we answer the most frequently asked questions regarding Article 777 KPC and voluntary submission to enforcement. We hope you find answers to your concerns here, which will help you fully understand this important aspect of loan security.
Yes, a notarial deed containing a statement of voluntary submission to enforcement, after being granted an enforcement clause by the court, has the same legal force as a final court judgment. This means that the creditor can directly refer the matter to a bailiff, bypassing traditional court proceedings.
A bailiff can seize movable property, real estate, part of remuneration for work, funds in a bank account, and other property rights. However, the law protects certain items and amounts, such as food products, fuel, religious items, social and family benefits, as well as part of remuneration and funds in a bank account within the so-called "free amount from seizure."
A statement of voluntary submission to enforcement, made in the form of a notarial deed, is binding and cannot be unilaterally withdrawn. It can only be challenged in court in the event of so-called defects in the declaration of will (e.g., error, deceit, threat), and the deadline for this is limited to one year from the discovery of the defect or the cessation of its cause.
The main risks for the borrower are the need for precise drafting of the notarial deed (inaccuracies may lead to the court refusing to grant the enforcement clause), the fast enforcement path limiting the time to potentially challenge the claim, and the fact that the statement cannot be easily withdrawn.
Yes, claims secured by a notarial deed under Article 777 KPC may become time-barred. The limitation period is usually 6 years, although this period may vary depending on the type of claim.
In the case of PaveNow loans, the costs of the notary visit related to signing the statement of voluntary submission to enforcement are fully covered by PaveNow. The borrower does not incur any fees in this regard.
Article 777 of the Code of Civil Procedure constitutes a powerful and effective tool in the loan security process, offering significant benefits to both lenders and borrowers. For PaveNow, its application minimizes the risk of non-repayment and enables the offering of more attractive financing conditions, even to individuals with limited credit history. For the borrower, although it is a form of security, it ensures transparency of terms, time, and cost savings in the event of potential repayment problems, by avoiding lengthy court proceedings.