PLN 100,000 Working Capital for an Event Organizer

How a young event company financed event preparation before receiving ticket sales payouts

The financing was based on predictable ticketing platform payouts and secured by an assignment of receivables. This allowed the company to cover organizational costs before the event, despite its short operating history and limited access to bank financing.

Kwota

100 000 zł

Branża

Eventy i wydarzenia biletowane

Cel

Koszty organizacyjne i produkcyjne

Źródło spłaty

Wpływy z platformy ticketingowej po wydarzeniu

Confidentiality note

Due to client confidentiality, we do not disclose the company name, event name or ticketing platform. This case study describes a real financing transaction, while preserving the client’s anonymity and simplifying selected operational details.

Who was the client?

The client was a young company from the event and promotional sector, organizing ticketed events and concerts. The company was expanding its service offering and planned to increase the number of events in the following season.

Its business model was based on selling tickets online through an external ticketing platform. This meant that interest in the event and ticket sales were visible earlier, but the actual cash inflow to the organizer came only after the event had taken place.

What created the liquidity gap?

In the event industry, costs often appear much earlier than revenue. The organizer needs to pay for production, logistics, promotion, technical support, subcontractors and event preparation before funds from ticket sales reach the company’s account.

In this case, ticket sales confirmed demand for the event, but the funds were to be transferred to the organizer only after the event was completed. The company therefore needed working capital for the preparation stage, not classic investment financing.

Cash flow timeline

Where did the liquidity gap appear?

In this business model, ticket sales were visible earlier, but the actual cash inflow to the organizer happened only after the event.

1

Ticket sales

Customers buy tickets through an external ticketing platform.

2

Preparation costs

The organizer covers production, promotion and operational costs before receiving the money.

3

Event delivery

The event is delivered according to the planned schedule.

4

Platform payout

Ticket sales proceeds are transferred to the organizer after the event.

5

Financing repayment

Repayment is aligned with the actual moment when the funds are received.

Key issue: the company had a predictable revenue source, but needed capital earlier to cover event preparation costs.

Why was bank financing difficult to obtain?

An additional challenge was the company’s short operating history. The company had only been operating for a limited period of time, so it did not yet have the financial history that banks typically expect when assessing an application.

At the same time, the problem was not a lack of market interest or a lack of a future repayment source. Revenue was linked to ticket sales, but the actual cash inflow was shifted in time. The key was therefore to find financing that reflected the specifics of the event industry and the real moment when the funds would be received.

How did PaveNow structure the financing?

PaveNow provided PLN 100,000 in financing, matched to the client’s cash inflow cycle. The security was an assignment of receivables from future ticket sales proceeds.

After the event was delivered, funds from the ticketing platform were transferred according to the agreed settlement structure. As a result, repayment was connected to the actual moment when revenue was received, instead of being disconnected from the company’s cash flow.

Financing parameters

Amount

PLN 100,000

Period

3 months

Purpose

Working capital for event preparation

Security

Assignment of receivables from future ticket sales proceeds

Repayment source

Ticketing platform payouts after the event

Challenge

Short operating history and limited access to bank financing

What did the financing enable?

Thanks to the financing, the client was able to cover event preparation costs without waiting for the final settlement of ticket sales. The funds helped the company maintain its organizational schedule and reduce the risk of delays caused by the timing mismatch between costs and incoming revenue.

The most important outcome was not only the disbursement of capital, but the fact that the financing was matched to the client’s business model. In practice, this meant that the company could operate according to the natural rhythm of the event industry: first preparing the event, then delivering it, and only afterwards receiving funds from ticket sales.

What can other event companies learn from this case?

This case shows that in the event industry, the problem is often not the lack of sales, but the timing of cash inflows. A company may have real demand for an event, sold tickets and a predictable source of revenue, and still need capital earlier.

In such situations, it is worth looking beyond a classic bank loan and considering financing matched to a specific cash flow: invoices, a contract, orders, ticket sales or other future receivables.

Business financing

Want to check what type of financing fits your company’s situation?

Talk to the PaveNow team and explore solutions for companies that need capital for day-to-day operations, larger projects, invoices, public-law obligations or growth.

Mateusz

Financing advisor

+48 889 274 772

Jakub

Financing advisor

+48 889 277 016

or email us at: finansowanie@pavenow.io
Availability: Monday–Friday, 9:00–17:00.